From: tgpedersen
Message: 34695
Date: 2004-10-16
> tgpedersen wrote:Europe
> > A loose idea (as usual): Suppose the substrate language of NW
> > (Pre-IE Nordwestblock) had dialect variations p/kW. That resultin
> > doublet (p/kW) loanwords in the successor IE languages (example:Cushitic
> > http://www.angelfire.com/rant/tgpedersen/pd.html , check the
> > forms, and *panna/*kanna?),*pag-/*pak-/*ka:k- (Danish 'kag' (ka:G), Swedish 'kåk' (kå:k),
> > perhaps to the point where theforms
> > Sprachgefühl demanded "resolution", preferring p-forms over kW-
> > or vice versa, whereupon the same preference spread to th restof the
> > language? Is this a good way to explain the Irish 'cothrige'-forms?
> >as being
>
> I don't believe in a substrate of NW-Europe, Pre-IE Nordwestblock
> the factor for this cahnge. We see the alternance in Celtic ( Qverus P), we
> see the alternance in East Of Europea ( Anicent Illiric/Thracianso "NW-Europe"
> Ulkiana/Ulpiana), we stil have this alternance living in Rom
> is not singular for a such afirmation. Apparentlythe "sprachgefühl" should
> fit more better but it will have the disavantage of lettinguncovered the
> "scientific" aspect of the thing. The phonetic change of "kW"to "p" cann be
> just one way I think:labial,
>
> -the lost of velar and consonating of the frontal "w" to a clean
> thus kW > W > b/pThe non-IE (as opposed to the later IE) Nordwestblock language is
>