Re: [tied] Re: Some thoughts...

--- Sean Whalen <stlatos@...> wrote:

Sorry, it should be:

> The following are all lasting or cyclic.
>
> a-tone>0/_Z(C)$[#/C/G]
>
> Z>+syllabic in nucleus
>
> a-tone>0/[#/C/G]$(C)Z_
>
> Z>+syl
>
> a-tone>0/V$Z_$CV

nucleus, not mora below

> mora>0 if unattached.

> Z>mora (but not nucleus)

now, mora>0 if unattached

> resyllabification
>
> repeat...
>
> C[N/L/G]X+sylC>C[Z+syl]XC (dialectal variations)?
>
> a-tone>0/#C_C if #CC allowed (s extrasyllabic)
>
> a-tone>0/VC_CV if first C less sonorant than second
> (obstruents probably count as same, some awkward CC
> probably not allowed or soon changed back)

Then repeat of nucleus>0, mora>0 and
resyllabification.





_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com