--- Sean Whalen <
stlatos@...> wrote:
>
> Pardon me, but I just recently joined this list.
> I'm an amateur who has been working on PIE internal
> reconstruction and was wondering if anyone has a
> suggestion about where to try to publish it (or can
> just tell me about a FAQ or something on the
> Internet). Thanks for any help.
I'm sorry to bother you all again, but I'd like to
be clearer. I've worked on an internal reconstruction
of PIE for about the last week and have formed over
100 rules that can derive any word from a base form
within a consistent framework. This is very important
to me, matching my wildest dreams (of linguistics).
I really would appreciate it if you would help me
or just tell me where an amateur's work could be
published or put online. This is for your benefit,
not mine, since I already know what I have done.
Almost all irregularities and oddities have been
explained, leaving an oldest form suitable for further
work linking it with Proto-Afro-Asiatic and -Uralic.
I know how this seems to you professional
linguists, but I've somehow managed to advance PIE
reconstruction more than it has in the past century.
I would think someone making these claims was worse
than the attempts at Nostratic or World Language from
current language forms, but I can't help it. It's all
real. Will you give me a chance?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail