Re: [tied] Talking of locatives [Was: Some thoughts...]

> From: Sergejus Tarasovas [mailto:S.Tarasovas@...]
> Is
> it possible that another Balto-Slavic "suffix of
> appurtenance" -- *-i(j)a- -- is actually a generalization of
> the same sequence without a hiatus-filler (or, rather, with
> [j] acting as a hiatus-filler)?
>

I should have written -*-(i)ja- (I meant, eg., Lith. -y~s (~ -is) < *-ija-,
-ias < *-ja-, Slavic *-j-).

Sergei