From: enlil@...
Message: 33688
Date: 2004-08-03
> 1) In the personal pronouns, the genitive is related to theThe genitive isn't "related" to the accusative in the pronominals.
> accusative, the difference being one of accent (*m(m)é ~
> *éme/*méne/*méme; *twé ~ *téwe; *swé, *séwe).
> 2) In the other pronouns, the endings are *-esyo and *-osyoTaken from the nominal thematic genitive singular.
> (the latter is also the thematic ending).
> 3) In ordinary nouns, the ending is *-os, *-es, *-s.The original genitive, found in athematic nouns.
> It stands to reason that the situation of the personalThis doesn't stand to reason necessarily. It's one of many options
> pronouns is the oldest one.
> This adjectival suffix was **-si-.On the other hand, we can do away with the artificial "adjective"
> When added to the athematic oblique in **-a, the result wasObviously since we have *wednos < *wat:an-asa, that can't be right.
> **-asi,
> The expected thematic forms are *-osyos, *-osyom, etc.When will we drop this fantasy? We don't need to theorize this idle
> The use of similar adjectival formations based on *-(e/o)lo- (Lydian,Actually, the connection with Tyrrhenian remains. While you pursue the
> Hittite genitive of the personal pronouns) and *-iyo- (Luwian, Lycian)
> shows that this was no isolated phenomenon.