Re: [tied] Re: again Slavic "dragU"

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:28:58 +0000, Abdullah Konushevci
<a_konushevci@...> wrote:

>> We are aware of the liquid metathesis. It affects the
>> _diphthongs_ /el/, /er/, /ol/ (or */al/), /or/ (or */ar/).
>
>[AK]
>We have completly different view about diphthongs.

In Balto-Slavic linguistics, Vl, Vr, Vm, Vn are considered
diphthongs.

>[AK]
>In previous messages, if my memory don't fail, you have claimed that
>PIE /*o:/ never (!) yields Slavic /a/.

Then I suppose your memory is failing you.

>> Of course PIE */o:/ gives Slavic /a/. The problem is that
>> there is no */o:/ in *dargas (> Pol. drog-, Russ. dorog-,
>> SSl. drag-).
>
>[AK]
>For the first time I saw that someone reconstruct protoform *dargas.

It's *dargas at the PBS level. That's Common Slavic
[ignoring N.Krivichian -e] *dorgU.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...