Re: again Slavic "dragU"

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Sergejus Tarasovas"
<S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
> <a_konushevci@...> wrote:
>
> > I try to find some kind of phonetical developmet from *dHrougH-o-
>
> > *drugU `friend'and to reconstruct some possible form *dHrogH-ú >
> > *dorgU for `dear'.
> > That's all folks!
>
> But you still haven't answered Miguel's objections: why do we have

*u

> in the first protoform and zero in the other? Such a vacillation
> looks rather unusual (other possible examples?), as does
> Schwebeablaut *-ro- ~ *-or- you seem to propose. "See Derksen

again"

> is not a proper answer since there seems to be no relevant
> information at iiasnt.leidenuniv.nl.
>
>
>
> Sergei

************
As far as I know, PIE diphthong /*ou/ yields in Slavic /u/ (cf.
*bhoudh- > bud-an, bud-iti, causative of *bheudh-; *k^lous- > sluh,
again causative of PIE *k^leu-) and long /*o:/ > /a/: *g^no:- > zna-
k, zna-ti; *k^o:- > sa-k-ica).

Konushevci