Re: [tied] again Slavic "dragU"

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

>
> There's _nothing but_ formal troubles. Di:ligo: is not "to
> love", it's "I love".

Ha ! one gives once the form of the verb in 1 sg and you are quicking
around. Of course is not "to love" but "I love".

> Drag(u) is an adjective (>
> substantive), not a 1p. sg. verbal form.

a regressive one from *drãgi

> Phonetically,
> di:ligere may have given *dreg^-, never drag-. It's all a
> waste of time, as usual.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

phoneticaly di:ligere may have given "drãg^" ( which is actually
present in "îndrãgi") and from "drãgi" we have a regresive derivate
"drag" (dear) < drãgu < diligo (I love)



Alex