Re: Re[6]: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel

From: enlil@...
Message: 33475
Date: 2004-07-10

Brian:
> [... angry accusatory rant ...] Secondly, I see nothing particularly
> confrontational in pointing out an apparent error, [... more anger ...]

Error? <:\ Yes, I do think you're being emotional here.

It is a _fact_ that not one language has been identified by you or
anyone showing an exclusive use of non-lexical vowels. Not one. It's
also common sense that it would be practically impossible to do so.

I'm being very generous in calling it a "rare" situation in order to
leave possibility for such a language to exist. So far it actually
doesn't appear to even exist.


= gLeN

Previous in thread: 33472
Next in thread: 33476
Previous message: 33474
Next message: 33476

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts