Re: [tied] Tyrhennian affiliation

Me to Miguel:

> Okay, maybe I goofed on that one. Can you find -c before that
> period of syncope? In addition, is there evidence of syncope
> even before this syncope?

Rob:

> Logic says that it *must* have had a vowel at first.

Well, this in fact is my position, Rob. I theorize that it was
from a Tyrrhenian postpositional particle *ke and related to IE
*kWe, yielding regular correspondances as I outlined.


= gLeN