From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 33001
Date: 2004-06-01
> From: Āąäčģ Ļīķąš˙äīā [mailto:ponaryad@...]...
> I do not know if Gr. skutHe:s is really connected with Old
> Pers. saka-, but in Old Persian inscriptions (also in
> Akkadian and Elamite versions) a form _skudra_ is present
>also in AkkadianBut cf. Akk. as^guzai, is^kuzai 'Scythians'.
> Phonetically Skudra is much closer to Skuthe:sBut sku:ca- (or sku:ça-) would look like a better candidate (if it really exists). Why, for one, would the Greeks just not render the name as *Skudrai? On the other hand, /tH/ looks like a probable substitution for a foreign s(h)ibilant affricate.
> than Saka, isn't it?
> Though some hystorians consider thatThus in the Kent's list. He doesn't comment much on why he prefers that explanation.
> Skudra are not Scytheans, but Thracians...