From: mcvwxsnl
Message: 32907
Date: 2004-05-24
> Miguel:Oh, I thought you had some kind of Penultimate Accent Rule, which
> > Does this mean that you now accept the fact that in compound
> > nouns, PIE could stress either the root (proterodynamic) or
> > the suffix (hysterodynamic)?
>
> I always did, Miguel.
> I'll illustrate step by step with the proterodynamic paradigm:Well, you're nearly there. All you need to realize now is that
>
> nominative:
> ROOT-m&n-s (after Thematicization)
> ROOT-m&.n-s (Schwa Diffusion -- *& lengthens before voiced *n)
> ROOT-man-s (Schwa Merger II -- *&. > *a)
> ROOT-mon-s (Vowel Shift -- *a > *o)
> ROOT-mo:n (Nominative Loss and Compensatory Lengthening)
> Miguel:No: that's the _initial accent rule for static [/a:/ root vowel]
> > (i.e. *á > *é, *á: and *â > *ó/*o, *a > *& > 0, except when
> > lengthened before *-z, when we have *a > *& > *&: > *o,
> > initial accent rule for static roots).
>
> Considering:
>
> *-tár-âs ~> *'-t&r-os > *-tr-os
>
> You violate your own rules.
> > So what is your theory exactly (preferrably in a form thatC=bpstgk...
> > is machine analyzable by the Sound Change applier)?
>
> I've listed the rules in chronological order numerous times. Look
> above. See my examples. The rules are simple but I honestly don't
> know how to put it into your "machine form" as you request. If I
> take your examples to imply that the rules are seperated with "/"
> with the first segment being a search criterion, the medial segment
> being the result of the change, and the last segment showing the
> changing item "_" within the larger context of a word form, then
> I guess I sort of understand but how do you translate for example:
>
> Schwa Diffusion:
> posttonic *& > *&. before voiced segment
> pretonic *& > *I
> Schwa Merger I:&./X/_
> *& > *e
> *I in closed syllables > *e
> *I in open syllables > *i
> Schwa Merger II:&./a/_
> *&. > *a
> Vowel Shift:a/X/_M
> *a not next to a labial segment > *o