Re: [tied] Re: Gland

On Wed, 12 May 2004 09:20:48 +0000, Richard Wordingham
<richard.wordingham@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>
>> As to *glacia, the ordering of the rules is the same:
>>
>> 1) kj > c (shared with all of Romance)
>> 2) gl- > gl^-
>> 3) -a > -ã
>> 3) gl^- > gj-
>> 4) ja > e (not in Aromanian: kl^ae, not cheie "key")
>>
>> [/glakja/ > /glaca/ > /gl^aca/ > /gl^ac&/ > /gjac&/ > /gec&/
>> = ghetz-]
>>
>> This is the plural form (ghetzuri). Singular gheatzã is, I
>> suppose, analogical after ceatzã, cetzuri (< caecia) and
>> other words with etymological ea ~ e "Ablaut".
>
>Is breaking before j-umlaut?

Yes. Breaking (up to o > oa, e > ea and ie > iea > ia) is
pan-Romanian (the unbreaking of ea > e before e, and ea > a
after labials is only Northern). Umlaut only applies to
/l^u/ (k^lid) in Aromanian, not to /l^a/ (kl^ae).

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...