From: george knysh
Message: 32038
Date: 2004-04-19
> theA67/A68
> > types Almgren
> > 67 and 68 (with subtypes) are the most, and
> Kostrewski
> > type M and N
> > (with subtypes) the least connected with
> inhumation,
> > so I believe if
> > any type of fibula is connected with an intrusive
> > Sarmatian element,
> > it should be A67/A68.
> >
> > GK: Ukrainian archaeologists consider Almgren
> toany
> > be "western type" fibulae (cf. e.g. V.D.Baran,
> ed.,
> > "The 'pre-statehood' Slavs of southeastern
> Europe"[in
> > Russ.],1990, pp. 76-79) and contrast them with
> fibulae
> > of local production in Sarmatian,
> Scytho-Sarmatian,
> > Zarubinian and other East European cultures.
>
>(TP) Do they ascribe these "western type" fibulae to
> particular*****GK: Not Baran. Just "western type" along with
> ethnos?
>finds of
>
>
> (TP)What would you say is characteristic of the
> those Sarmatian*****GK: Which of the sites you mention earlier are
> groups (particularly of those "Asgard" and Vanaland"
> areas?).
>*****GK: I don't know. Baran notes that many fibulae
>
> And have the fibulae type Kostrzewski var M and
> N been linked
> with any particular ethnos?
>__________________________________
> Torsten
>
>
>