From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 31099
Date: 2004-02-15
>>The lengthening of the root vowel in the s-aorist suggests to me that theNo. I mean, yes according to Szemerényi, but in fact no.
>>original shape was *deyk^s > *de:yk^s, with length due to normal
>>"Szemerényi lengthening", as in the nom.sg..
>
>Isn't Szemerényi lengthening due to loss of the following -s?