From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 30706
Date: 2004-02-05
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:13:55 +0000, altamix <alxmoeller@...>
> > >of the Romanist from you:the /i/
>
> > >-because of "zi" and not the expected "ze"
> >
> > *What* expected "ze"?
> >
> > =======================
> > Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> > mcv@...
>
> To mention your own words, the "z" from "di" is via "dj" which can
> appear in that posiion just due diphtongation of /i/ to /ie/;
> of the diphtong /ie/ palatalises the /d/ and become absorbed bythis,
> remaining just an /e/; this /e/ can remain /e/ or diphtongues againThere are four Latin sources of Romanian z:
> if in the next syllable is an /ã/ or an /e/
> OK, the infinitive form is "a zice"Alex, what do you base this sequence of developments on? Fallible
>
> Latin di:ce(re) > PBR *dice > *diece > *dz'ece > *zece