Re: The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))

In article <bvgiko+d6gh@eGroups.com> elmeras2000 <jer@...> wrote:
. . .

> There is quite a lot of evidence for the voicedness of /H3/ now,
> only not very many know about it. The analysis of the variants of
> the "Hoffmann suffix" *-H3en(H2)- delivers a series of new examples,
> as soon as Birgit Olsen's papers on it appear. There's a congress
> report from a Copenhagen symposium on IE derivation edited by
> herself just about to appear, and there is an analysis of relevant
> Avestan forms in a festschrift which may or may not have appeared
> already (I guess I'd better not mention the name of the receiver).

Does this evidence of voicedness affect the glottalic hypothesis
or would the phenomena also be explicable with voicedness as redefined
in the various glottalic proposals?

--
Brent J. Ermlick Veritas liberabit uos
brent3@...