Re: [tied] Re: Hiugom?????

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:58:28 +0000, elmeras2000 <jer@...> wrote:

>RV I.163.2:
>yaména dattám. tritá enam a:yunag
>índra en.am prathamó ádhy atis.t.hat
>gandharvó asya ras'aná:m agr.bhn.a:t
>sú:ra:d ás'vam. vasavo nír atas.t.a
>
>Ein Geschenk des Yama schirrte ihn Trita an;
>Indra bestieg ihn zum ersten Male.
>Der Gandharva fasste seinen Zügel.
>Aus der Sonne habt ihr Götter das Ross gebildet. (Geldner)
>
>The entire hymn is about the horse, and enam/ihn refers to the horse.
>
>The Padapa:t.ha gives ayunak.
>
>Neither the Sam.hita: nor the Pad. has an accent on the verbal form
>a(:)yunak. That should be proof that a preverb is not meant to be
>included even in the reading /a:yunak/.

I see.

>The Pad. should make
>explicit mention of the preverb if there is one.

But there isn't one in the Pad. form <ayunak>!


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...