From: altamix
Message: 30164
Date: 2004-01-28
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" wrote:in
>
> >> Your said that :
> >> 1. " Since /*s/ > /sh/ happened for sure at some historical
> >> moment in Albanian and since all Latin loanwords in Albanian
> >> exhibit this feature, the most likely assumption is of course
> >> that the change took place afterwards."
> >
> > This is only one possibility. And it isn't 'the most likely'
> > this situation (viewing the moment of the slavic loans).etc...
>
> Of course it is the most likely.
>
> > The other one is that /*s/ > /sh/ was ALREADY active on all the
> > period of Latin loans, and that 'strunga','sterp','brusture'
> > are older than this moment.And what do we learn from here? All Latin loans presents "sh" for
>
> It depends what do you mean by "active".
> Anyway, let's denote by t1 the historical moment of the last Latin
> loanwords in Albanian and by t2 the historical moment of the first
> Slavic loanwords in Albanian. Since the feature F:= {/s/ > /sh/} is
> exhibited by all Latin words, the most likely hypothesis -- by all
> means the one which makes less assumptions -- has to be that F
> occured in (proto-)Albanian for all words concerned at some tF such
> as t1 < tF < t2, explaining thus everything. If one supposes that
> tF < t1, then at t1 Albanian had no longer the phoneme /s/, so the
> supplementary assumption that all Latin /s/ from loanwords mapped
> with perfect regularity in Albanian /sh/ (just by chance similar to
> what happened earlier at tF) has to be done. That makes two instead
> of one, plus the coincidence. It is _highly_ unlikely.
>
> Cheers,
> Marius Iacomi