From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 29696
Date: 2004-01-16
> Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:later.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "alex" <alxmoeller@...>
> > To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 1:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Latin pinso etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >> That is that. How can one show there was no "s^" in that time in
> >> BecomingAlbanian but there has been an "z^" ?
> >
> > There wasn't!! *s and *z became respectively *s^ and *z^ much
> > The gaps they left in the phonological system of Old Albanian werehave
> > filled by older *c^ and *3^, which have become Modern Albanian /s/
> > and /z/.
> >
> > Piotr
>
> Which *s and *z do you mean here? The PIE *s and *z?
>
> Now to this "z". There is a difference in Alb. between "z" and "dh".
> Now, there is in Alb. and Rom. for instance the
> common suffix zã/zë which in Alb. is different from suffix "-dhe" or
> "-dhë" ( equivalent of Rom. suffix -dã)
>
> Since you say that the Modern Albanian /z/ is coming from an *3^I
> to admit in Rom. the /z/ in this suffix is too coming from an*3^which
> is false.Rom.
> Then the /z/ in Modern Albanian must be old , at least as old as in
> The last question here should be interesting for Abdullah. Arethere in
> Albanians archaic & regional forms of the words which have variantsof
> "z" as "z^" or "gj-"?************
>
> Alex