From: tgpedersen
Message: 29562
Date: 2004-01-14
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>wrote:
>Thus, in the local Celtic, /d/ > /t/, but no change in /k/?
> >> "Zürich" is a corrupted germanized form of Latin "Turicum" --
> >> the name Romans give to the city they founded in 15 B.C. -- which
> >> has nothing to do with "Thor", being probably connected to Celtic
> >> "dur" `water`.
>
> > Full of Tur-/Tor- names. As for what *tur- in Turicum is, none of
> > us can say.
>
> Well, a 100% safety would be excessive, but since:
> a) the city was founded by Romans in 15 B.C. and called "Turicum";
> b) first inhabitants were Celtic lake dwellers;
> c) "dur" means `water` in Celtic;
> d) there were no "Thor"-inspirational sources in immediate vicinityCircular.
> of the city at Roman establishment: Alamans came centuries later;
> ... there is little hope for "Thor" being the root for Latin nameIn the link I gave.
> "Turicum" (for which a Celtic origin looks most likely).
>
> > I'm just observing that the element *tur- is all over the place.
>
> Which place? Examples?!
> Outside Germanic area, why on earth should a geographical unitLast someone went ballistic I think my favorite God's name was Odin?
> name containing the initial _string of characters_ "tur-" or "tor-"
> assigned a particular meaning to that string (as "element"), and
> further assumed that meaning has to be related to "Thor"?! That
> sounds pretty bad for usual pertinence standards in linguistics.
> Not every "tur" ("tor") in the world has something to do with your
> favorite matching god name (for instance, Romanians have "tur" as
> legitimate word meaning `trousers' posterior` but I wouldn't relate
> it even for a joke with the mighty Thor...).