From: Alexander Stolbov
Message: 29391
Date: 2004-01-11
> >(AS) My opinion: this culture [GK:Yamna(ya)] beginsGeorge, how could we come to a common position having taken into account all
> when Eneolithic
> > tribes of Lower Volga get in
> > touch with the Maikop culture and obtain from the
> > latter the Near East
> > innovations of that epoque: arsenical bronze and
> > wagons with solid wheels.
> > Besides, some more scecific cultural features were
> > adopted: stone sceptres
> > (and axes) as the sign of power and the burial rite
> > (individual ingumation
> > under kurgans). The Corded Ware cultures, as well as
> > those cultures which
> > remained in the steppe, inherited all of these
> > innovations and features.
> *****GK: I am fairly certain that they were migrants
> from the "Skelya horizon" area east of the Dnipro. And
> I assume that they quickly became a mixed lot (judging
> from their burial practices). I think that there were
> many ex-Trypilians among them, in the wake of the
> catastrophic end of Classical Trypilia's agricultural
> experiment. So I wouldn't make the Serednyj Stih =>
> western Corded Ware equation absolute, though the
> fumdamental cultural impulse was certainly from that
> area.*****
>
> > Did that earliest CW have wagons, sceptres and
> > kurgans according to your
> > sources?
>
> *****GK: No evidence as to waggons. They were not
> included in the burials as in later Yamna, and have
> otherwise not survived. No scepters either, though
> many burials had stone battle axes (some only stone
> knives). Kurgan burials predominated, but were not
> exclusive (and in many kurgans the remains were not
> inhumations but calcinations). In the Podilia group,
> there were many "flat" burials.******