From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 29174
Date: 2004-01-06
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:07:50 +0000, Glen Gordon <glengordon01@...>And is seen in the variant di- of dis-, e.g. English _digress_,
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Miguel:
> >>*dhéh1s-nom -> fíísnam
> >>*dh&1s-nóm -> fasnom -> fa:num
> >
> >Seems like a cheap ploy to explain away an aberrant form.
>
> No, just the standard way Latin behaves.
>
> >While *h1 might explain Latin -a-, what explains the mystery
> >disappearance of this unattested "s"? What exactly is the
> >process? What am I missing?
>
> What you didn't miss earlier in nisdos > ni:dus.