From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 28550
Date: 2003-12-16
>In article <local.pie/tovttv4ieq84c06es79vjjib8q7rm81ao0@4ax.com> MiguelAs you can see above, I wasn't denying that. However, I do think some of
>Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>. . .
>> initially (anti-hiatus *h-) the normal result is -0-, but medially
>> (anti-hiatus *-oho-, *-eho-) we find -g- (> -h- in Upper Sorbian, Czech,
>> Slovak, Belorussian, Ukrainian, Southern Russian) and -v- (Northern
>> Russian).
>
>But in Upper Sorbian, Czech, etc, all /g/ -> /h/.
>I can't get toNo, medial -s- remains as -s-. The Slavic (as well as Lithuanian) genitive
>my Czech historical grammar right now, but I seem to remember Czech
>words occurring in early Latin prose (10th & 11th century) in Bohemia
>with "g" rather than "h". This would imply (but not require) the
>change of *g -> *h in the historic period.
>
>I also don't recall any other instances where PIE or pre-Slavic
>medial *s develops into Slavic _g_.
>I see what you're thinking, but I have reservations about a phoneticSometimes that can't be helped, take for instance the unique development in
>change that only occurs in one unique grammatical environment.