From: tgpedersen
Message: 28152
Date: 2003-12-08
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:00:17 +0000, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...>spontaneous
> wrote:
>
> >Creoles are based on other languages, which do have pronouns. Thus
> >the the occurrence of pronouns in them in not a case of
> >creation based ion the hardware of our brain.that
>
> Creole grammar is not based on other languages. It has been argued
> all creole grammars are similar, and that they representthe "innate"
> grammar of human language ("language organ", etc.).That of course does not constitute proof.
>Whatever one thinks ofminimal
> that, Creole grammars certainly represent a sort of baseline,
> grammar. And they never fail to include personal pronouns.Which are present in the languages the creoles are constructed from.
>Of course they are. On the language of the speaker (or reader) who
> Sign language is not based on spoken languages at all.
>
> In the case of NicSL, the transition from "signed pidgin" to a realsign
> language is illustrated as follows:a more
> (http://www.indiana.edu/~langacq/E105/Nicaragua.html)
>
> -It was noticeable at once that the younger children used signs in
> -nuanced way than the older students. For example, the teen-agepidgin
> -signers at Villa Libertad had a basic gesture for "speak" --opening and
> -closing four fingers and a thumb in front of the mouth. The youngerfingers at
> -children used the same sign, but modulated it, opening their
> -the position of the speaker and closing them at the position of theall
> -addressee. To Kegl, this apparently small difference had enormous
> -implications. "This was verb agreement," she says, "and they were
> -using it fluently."I think "verb agreement" is a misnomer in a language that has no
>
>