From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 27890
Date: 2003-12-01
> 01-12-03 22:07, etherman23 wrote:only
>
> > I've been reading Szemerenyi's Introduction to Indoeuropean
> > Linguistics and I've come upon what appears to be a odd
> > reconstruction. It concerns the word *st@... (stall), and he
> > gives Lat. stabulum as a reflex. Two things struck me as odd, thewere
> > reconstruction of schwa and the reconstruction of dh. If Latin
> > the only source language I would expect these sounds to be /a/Lat.
> > and /b/ or /bh/.
> >
> > Now my sources are somewhat limited and my knowledge of the
> > historical changes also limited, but I couldn't find any obvious
> > reflexes of *st@... in any language. OTOH, I could find several
> > words that appear to come from something like *stab(h)lo. To make
> > matters worse I consuled two dictionaries and both agree that
> > stabulum comes from stare (which of course comes from *sta:).me.
> > Furthermore I couldn't find st@... in Pokorny's list.
> >
> > So I'm hoping that you experts out there could clear this up for
> > Is there any basis for Szemerenyi's reconstruction? If he is incognates:
> > error, what is the correct reconstruction of the apparent
> >(reduction
> > English stable
> > Irish stable
> > Greek stablos
> > Latin stabulum (?)
> >
> > Could *st@... be cognate with stadium?
>
> It _is_ related to <sta:re>, as the root of both is *stah2-
> grade *st&2-) 'stand'. <stabulum> contains the instrumental suffixis
> *-dHlom ~ *-tlom (Lat. -b(u)lum ~ -c(u)lum [sic!]). The Latin word
> not isolated: the Germanic cognate is *staþla- < *st&2-tlo- (withthe
> other variant of the suffix), giving OE staþol 'foundation, base,by
> trunk', OHG stadal 'barn, storehouse' (hence also Polish stodol/a
> 'barn'). PIE *dH regularly gave Lat. [b] in medial positions when
> followed by [l] (also when followed by [r] or [w], or when preceded
> [u] or [r] -- see Szemerényi's phonological chapter), and medial *-tl-
> was dissimilated to [-kl-].************
>
> Piotr