Re: [tied] Re: Caland [was -m (-n)?]

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 27874
Date: 2003-12-01

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:16:15 +0000, elmeras2000 <jer@...> wrote:

>There developed a movable accent in u-stems, so IE had *pér-tu-s,
>gen. *pr-téw-s. That is not problematic, only complicating.

Do you think that this mobile accent in the u-stems was secondary?

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...