Re: [tied] Re: Caland [was -m (-n)?]

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:00:45 +0000, elmeras2000 <jer@...> wrote:

>> In Slavic, we can also think of *n.no or of -Ino < *-no- directly,
>with a
>> cluster-breaking /I/ between two consecutive cononants, as in the
>D/I/Lpl.
>> of the C-stems, as required by Slavic phonotactics.
>
>So? That would hardly make it parallel with *-ro- and *-u-.

I was merely trying to make case for it being productive.


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...