Re: [tied] Re: 'Dog' revisited

From: Glen Gordon
Message: 27835
Date: 2003-11-29

Miguel:
>If *k^(u)wo:n is really *pk^(u)wo:n, that immediately explains the Lindeman
>variant.
>[...]
>If *dak^ru- "tear" is *dh2ak^ru- ~ *h2ak^ru-, then *dwo: "2" is perhaps
>*dh1wi- ~ *h1wi-.

Yes, then perhaps *twe is really **gtptwe. Whatever. We can invent
initial phonemes wherever we please at this rate. Just because it could
be doesn't make it so.


= gLeN

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/features&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca