Re: [tied] Re: 'Dog' revisited

From: Glen Gordon
Message: 27735
Date: 2003-11-27

Richard:
>Is this consistent with the reconstruction of the 'cattle' word as
>*pekun-, as Miguel proposes, if I understand hime right, at
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nostratica/message/762 ? *pekun- is
>perhaps an archaic form by PIE, but, if I understand correctly,
>formation of *pk^wo:n is also old history by then.

I can't agree that *peku was once a heteroclitic. I think it's the
other way around -- that the heteroclitic spread to non-heteroclitic
inanimates ending in any sonorant. The MIE version of *peku was
*p�keu (gen. pek�use), in my view, while that of the root *kwon-
was *kew�ne (gen. kewen�se). The two are not related.

I'm still thinking about the supposed accent on *u in the variant
*k�wo:n. Yet with *d�wo:-, it becomes a little more suspect as
evidence for Piotr's case. Is it possible that this is just a rule
affecting nouns starting in Cw- where C is any stop?


= gLeN

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963