From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 27304
Date: 2003-11-17
> To return to the original question. Is Albanian the moderndescendant of a
> pre-Roman language of Illyria?continues a
>
> I think there are basically two possibilities. Albanian indeed
> pre-Roman language of Illyricum/Dalmatia, or Albanian continues apre-Roman
> language of Moesia Superior. The provinces of Thrace and Macedonia[which
> included modern Albania and Kosovo] can be excluded because theywere
> "Greek". Dacia (north of the Danube) can be excluded because itwas in
> Roman hands for a short while only.can in
>
> Linking Albanian to Moesia has several advantages. Since Moesian
> all probability be linked to the satem group composed of Dacian,Getic and
> Thracian, the satem nature of Albanian is explained without muchado.
> Linking Albanian to Illyrian, on the other hand, requiresexplaining away
> the evidence for Messapic and some of the Illyrian glosses beingcentum.
>the
> Given that Romanian and Albanian seem to share a common substrate,
> identification of this substrate as Moesian also simplifies theEastern
> Romance dialectal picture: the Latin of Illyricum develops intoDalmatian,
> the Latin of Moesia into Romanian.************
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
> /sht/ (cf. aphaeresis of unstressed /a/ in: Lat. amicus > Alb.mik 'friend', Lat. angustus > Alb. (i,e) ngushtë; cf. evolution of