Alex:
>Do you mean here the "style" of the letter comparative with how you as
>an educated person would exprime the message he send to Mr. Bengner?
Oh lovely. I thought I was the only one that spontaneously developped
snazzy terms. I'm going to "exprime" this word today amongst friends.
>No. That is a failure in your interpretation. First of all, the peasant
>of today speaks "almost" as Neacshu ;
But since this is not your original statement, we've not failed in
interpretation.
You've merely failed in communication. Avoiding these zealous exaggerations
in the future will facilitate our interpretation.
>That will mean we have today 1000 years (prooved) _with minor phonetical
>changes_. Agree or not?
What does it mean at all? It's only another _subjective_ statement. Another
"parere" on your part. Do you know the difference between facts and
supposition? You can base nothing logical on personal feelings. How minor
is "minor"? We can all say something different.
Very frustrating you are.
= gLeN
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca