Re: [tied] Re: illyrian lexicon or inventory

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

>
> *wik^á:-pot- > *dz^a:(p)t- > zot
> *wik^á:-potn(i)ja: > *dz^a:(pt)nja: > zonjë
>
> *w(i)k^- > *dzw- > *dz^- > z- as in *wik^m.tih1 > *dz^ati- > -zet
> '20'. Strange but true.
>
> Piotr

when should have happened the methathesis then? after k^> z or before?
(I assume you see the "z" there from the "k^")

Alex