From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 27127
Date: 2003-11-13
>No. The Semitic stress was either sáb`atum (penult not short, so
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
>To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:55 PM
>Subject: Re: [tied] All of creation in Six and Seven
>
>
>> I'm not sure where the stress fell in PS *sab`atu(m),
>> but PIE *septm. is consistent with an original (pre-zero-grade) stress
>> pattern *<sébVtVm> -> *<séptm.>
>
>I was wondering if the original pattern wasn't something like **sab(a)túm >
>*septm.', without a stress shift.