From: m_iacomi
Message: 26746
Date: 2003-10-31
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:^^^^^^
>> 30-10-03 15:00, Marco Moretti wrote:
>> [...] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> Not _ALL_ your arguments, in general, but only your arguments
>>> about this toponym Samsø. If you have no clear etymology for it,
>>> whatever you say of a Germanic *sam- in it makes no sense. I
>>> only affirmed the non-IE, pre-Germanic nature of the item,
>>> without linking it with something else. Perhaps the protoform
>>> of Samsø was more convoluted, but it remains clearly non-IE.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> [...] I fail to see why it should be CLEARLY non-IE.
>
> No one said it was _clearly_ non-IE.