From: tolgs001
Message: 26575
Date: 2003-10-21
>so we get <król>, <král>, <kralj>, <korol>, as if theDid the official -Latinized- Carolus play any role here?
>word dated back to Proto-Slavic.
><sclavus> is just a Latin adaptation of the Slavic ethnonymThat's what subdialects in Western Romania still do, e.g. in
>(Latin had no /sl-/, so /-k-/ was automatically inserted to
>make the word pronouncible in terms of Latin phonotactics).
>PiotrGeorge