From: m_iacomi
Message: 26407
Date: 2003-10-13
> Abdullah Konushevci wrote:BS. Slavic loanwords like "omorî" or "vârî" follow the same pattern
>
>> (12) oborî(to put down),-yes
>
> OK, one wants to see why I doubt about same of them. For instance
> "oborî" to put down is considered to be Slavic. You mean it is
> Slavic too. I have my doubts because:
>
> -the verb has a tematic conjugation " obor, obori, oboarã" and it
> is usualy not aplayable to Slavic loans
> -there are the verbs "doborî" [...] with unknown etymologyIt's obvious the verbs are related and the initial consonant has
> - there is the verb "coborî" [...] The etymology of this one is
> too with unknon etymology, DEX means "see pogorî"
> -there is the verb "pogorî" which means the same as "coborî"
> and is with unknown etymology too.
> -there is the verb "scoborî" with the same meaning as "coborî",
> just prefixed with "s-"
> The word "pogorî" seems to me to be Slavic. If one accept thatThe idea is not so bad after all, but is invalidated by "oboriti"
> pogorî is a compound of Slavic po+gore (on mountain)
> then the verb "pogorî" appears to be Slavic indeed but the restWhy?
> it does not appear to be Slavic.
> About the rest, my opinion is that here one has to deal with the...`to rise`, that is all on the contrary. Your supposition is
> root "bor-" here (extened with "c" in some exemples). This could
> reflect a substratual word from /o/ grade of *PIE bher-, Pokorny
> #229 with the meaning of "erheben, aufheben" .
> One will ask why I consider this can be substratual one?... but more probably, that Dacian word has something to do with
> I guess in Dacian we have some data for making maybe a connection.
> ( I say Dacian because just in Dacian space , not in the Thracian
> one I have these testimonies).
> Thus , it is very possible that one word for "mountain" or "high
> place" has been in Dacian "bor-" or "bur-".
> We have ancient topoynms in Dacia as "Buridava", Tribe name asSo?! we have in Romanian "borangic", "borcan", "buric", "burzului",
> "Buridavenses".
> The suffix "-ca" is for sure of substratual originThat's for fun, isn't it?!
> and it is several time found in Dacian toponyms.Well, time for sleep has come. Toponyms' endings (not suffixes)
> What will make the connection with Dacian data and actual RomanianLemme guess... wishful thinking?!
> language?
> Well, verbs as "aburca"= to go up on the mountains"aburca" means `to mount, to put something up, to get on some
> and toponyms as "Borcea" and "Borceni"... of undoubtable autochtonous origin and mountain-linked... :-)))
> aburca; cf DEX unknown etymology: like "urca"False. In DEX it's used the word "probabil" (`probably`), not
> urca : vt (scara) to mount; (un munte) to climb ; (preturile) to
> raise; (a înalta) to put up vi to rise; (a crste) to grow up;
> (într-un) to get up; cf DEX = maybe from Latin *oricare ( = oriri)