Re: Re[2]: [tied] Glen, regarding...

From: João Simões Lopes Filho
Message: 26321
Date: 2003-10-10

I agree intregally with you. The illegal imigration is  "illegal" only to supply a legion of cheap, exploitable workers. The American corporations spread all over the world without barriers, but the people cannot follow the inverse way. The so-called globalization is  "one-way".
 
Joao
Rio
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick C. Ryan
To: LIST-Cybalist
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [tied] Glen, regarding...

Dear Joao:

 

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [tied] Glen, regarding...

Eh eh, this is a circular definition: Latino is everyone who consider themselves as Latino. Would it include Brazilians? The definition states that is aplicable to Spanish-language countries, which would automatically exclude Brazilians, but if a Brazilian consider himself as a Latino it will be a Latino. By this circular definition , if Swedes identify themselves as Latinos, they will be Latinos. Amazing.
 
<PCR> Amazing? It is pathetic. But there is logic behind it all. The primary force guiding "definitions" is the desire by certain American business interests to ensure a steady supply of cheap, hapless labor. And the continuing flood of immigrants is designed to exert pressure on the already residing illegal immigrants not to get uppity, and actually demand a living wage.
 
I have serious doubts about the integrity of anyone who would accept a US government agency definition for anything since facts or truth play no part in them whatsoever.
 
Joao SL
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:01 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [tied] Glen, regarding...

At 10:09:23 PM on Wednesday, October 8, 2003, Patrick C.
Ryan wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>

>> Define "Latino".

> <PCR> In the politically correct USA, Latino is the
> favored term to designate Mexican Amerindians, who speak
> Spanish (even as a second language).

> It is sometimes extended to Amerindians from other
> countries who speak Spanish.

This is wildly inaccurate.  Here's what the U.S. Census
Bureau says:

  Hispanics or Latinos are those people who classified
  themselves in one of the specific Spanish, Hispanic, or
  Latino categories listed on the Census 2000 questionnaire
  -"Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano," "Puerto Rican", or
  "Cuban" -as well as those who indicate that they are
  "other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino." Persons who indicated
  that they are "other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino" include
  those whose origins are from Spain, the Spanish-speaking
  countries of Central or South America, the Dominican
  Republic or people identifying themselves generally as
  Spanish, Spanish-American, Hispanic, Hispano, Latino, and
  so on.

Everyday usage varies but certainly does not restrict the
term to Mexican Americans; the traditional term for them is
<Chicano, -a>.

Brian




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
Pat
 

PATRICK C. RYAN | PROTO-LANGUAGE@...
(501) 227-9947 * 9115 W. 34th St. Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 USA
WEBPAGES: PROTO-LANGUAGE: http://www.geocities.com/proto-language/
and PROTO-RELIGION:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2803/proto-religion/indexR.html

"Veit ec at ec hecc, vindgá meiði a netr allar nío,
geiri vndaþr . . . a þeim meiþi, er mangi veit,
hvers hann af rótom renn." (Hávamál 138)



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.