From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 26275
Date: 2003-10-07
>06-10-03 04:12, Fritz Saxl wrote:The only objective criterion would be "smallest amount of mutations" to get
>
>> Thinking about the IE words for "brother", sansk. bhratr, gr. frater,
>> lat.frater, germ. brodar, I realized that the germanic word is more
>> closely related to sanskrit than the others. Have you any thoughts on this?
>
>The actual cognates of Skt. bHra:tar- (nom.sg. bHrá:ta:) include the
>following:
>
>Avestan bra:ta:
>Latin fra:ter
>Greek pHra:té:r
>Slavic *bratrU, *bratU
>Baltic *bra:t- (Lith. brólis, Latv. brãlis represent old pet forms)
>Celtic *bra:ti:r (OIr. bráth(a)ir, Wel. brawd, pl. brodyr)
>Germanic *bro:þar- (Goth. bro:þar, OE bro:þor, OHG bruodar, ON bróðir)
>Tocharian (A) pracar, (B) procer
>Armenian eLbayr
>
>All of them are derived more or less straightforwardly from PIE
>*bHráh2ter- via well-known sound changes. How do you figure out that the
>Sanskrit and Germanic forms are "more closely related than the others"?
> /o/); in Armenian, *bra:ti:r may have developed to el~bayr troughdifferent paths, etc.]