From: Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen
Message: 26151
Date: 2003-09-30
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Mate Kapovic wrote:
> As there is an ongoing discussion on Brugmann's Law I would like to know
> if
> somebody has an explanation on why is there no BL in skr. rasa: from PIE
> *(H)roséh2 (cf. Lith. rasa, Slavic rosa). I guess that *reseh2 is not the
> answer...
>
> thanks,
> Mate
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> click here
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>