From: alex
Message: 25940
Date: 2003-09-22
>> 1.1. Evolution /*e/ > /ja/One will observe in the given examples that there is the same rule as in
>> Bisedes evolution /*e/ > /ie/ its also common evolution /*e/
>> /ja/,
>> especialy before the nasals and liquids: *esmi > (unë) jam `(I)
> am',
>> *mel > mjaltë, but also *dek^s- > i djathtë `right', *H3ep > jap
> `to
>> produce'.
>
> /ja/ is the regular product of *e before (some) old clusters.
> Jap 'give' has optional j-, prs. jap jep jep or ap ep ep, so the
> vowel is Alb. /a/.
>> 1.3. Evolution /*e/ > /i/The same here regarding the /e/>/i/ in Rom. Lang. before /nC/. BTW, in
>> If /*e/ is followed by consonantal cluster, the outcome is e-CC>i-
> CC:
>> *g^herzd(h)-, metathetic variant *g^hrezd(h) > drithë `cereals,
> bread
>> grains', *pezd- > pith, pidhi `vagine', *bhend- > bind `to
> convince,
>> to persuade'.
>I have a question regarding "n-gjamë". This word looks too similar to
>> 3. /se-/ > /gja-/ in both dialects
>> *serp- > gjarpër `snake', *s(w)eks- > gjashtë `six', *seuHk- >
>> gjak `blood', *sem- > n-gjamë `similar'
>
> 'Snake' and 'six' are okay, except that the /a/ is part of a
> diphthongization of *e to /ja/ (before old clusters) which is here
> obscured by the preceding /gj/. - Gjak is most often understood as
> *sokWos, identical with OCS sokU and Gk. opós 'juice', a fine
> metaphor for blood. - ngjamë or just gjamë is the ptc. og ngjas or
> just gjas, i.e. the -m- is the participial morpheme and not part of
> the root; to boot, gj- is here from gl-, Buzuk glame; the prefixed
> nasal is perhaps a reduced *som-.