Re: [tied] PIE Stop System

wtsdv wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
>>
>> . . . And of course the, centum/satem groups will need to be
>> re-defined.
>
> Your revisionist ambitions know no bounds! Maybe you should
> first prove your odd claims about Romanian before attempting
> to go even deeper, into P.I.E. reconstructions, and more so
> before the Nostratic.
>
> David

Huh? Ever heard about that kind of scenarios "what it should be if ...
"? I do not intend to revision anything, it was just the logical
conclusion of this kind of scenario. Any my claims about Romanian have
their basis there. If for you Rom. Lang is the Latin language spoken
nowadays in a part of the world I have no problem with it.

Alex