>
> . . . And of course the, centum/satem groups will need to be
> re-defined.
Your revisionist ambitions know no bounds! Maybe you should
first prove your odd claims about Romanian before attempting
to go even deeper, into P.I.E. reconstructions, and more so
before the Nostratic.
David
> Question: any evidence in Uralic for labiovelars?
>
> alex