Re: [tied] Re: PIE *le:p/*la:b

m_iacomi wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" wrote:
>
>>> If any relationship at all, then the -tz- remains to be explained
>>> (the final -at being only the participle ending, also used in
>>> adjectives). Seemingly, no attestations for an inferred initial
>>> *lãpãrtzat.
>>
>> common suffix in some substratual and non-substratual verbs
>>> a(s)muTa, aTâTa, agãTa, forTa, incãlTa, etc.
>
> In these words, /T/ is a part of the stem.
> Do you know what the word "suffix" means?
>
> Marius Iacomi

Indeed , they are part of the stem; there is no suffix.

lex