From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 25745
Date: 2003-09-11
> 11-09-03 02:19, Abdullah Konushevci wrote:act',
>
>
> > Because you are so interested in Alb. /f/, I will try to answer,
> > taking not e little risk to be misunderstand.
> > If we take a look to some PIE roots, like *spend- `to make an
> > offering, perform a rite, hence to engage oneself by a ritual
> > we should easy notice that Alb. verb <fal> `to release, torelieve,
> > to pardon, to excuse, to forgive' and its intransitive formto you,
> > <falem> `to pray, to beg, to supplicate' with many idiomatic
> > constructions, like "Të falem, o Zot" â" I am offering myself
> > o God'; with many other derivates: <falemnderit> `Thank you',adv.
> > <falas> `free' gratuitously', <falëmeshënder> `greetings,we may
> > salutation', faltore `shrine, temple', preserved in one much
> > fossilized form in place names Fandi i Madh and Fandi i Vogël,
> > conclude that these words are derived from *(s)pend-. Indeed, thelo,
> > first group: fal, falem, faltore, falje are probably derived from
> > suffixed zero-grade form *(s)pHnd-lo, developed later in *(s)pand-
> > and are deverbative of name in â"lo stem, through regularevolution
> > of /dl/ > /ll/, as I mention many times before, when palatalsubstitution of
> > liquid /ll/, being in intervocalic position, became alveolar /l/.
>
> Isn't it simply a relatively late loan from Slavic? The
> /f/ for /xv ~ xf/ is easy and frequent: SCr. <hvala> 'gratitude,thanks'
> (pronounced <fala> by Macedonians!), <hvala ti> 'thank you!',<hvaliti>
> 'praise', etc.[AK]
>derivates:
> > Phonetically speaking, much convincing are words: <farë> `seed,
> > sperm, semen' <*(s)por-a:-, present also in Romanian, with
> > farëhedhës `sewer', <farëpalënë> `childless', <farës>`seedy',
> > <farëhumbur> `scatter-brained', <for a>, <bëj fora> `scatter'and
> > <hamshor >`stallion, stud-horse', _frushkull/vrushkull_ < *(s)prus-k-
> > lo- `spray;, all from different grades and forms of PIE *(s)per-`to
> > strew'.
>
> I agree about <farë> and related. *sp- > Alb. f- is credible, and
> parallelled by *sk- > h-. Of course, it's a combinative change and
> doesn't allow one to posit *p > f without the accompanying *s.
>
> Piotr