Re: Some Albanian-Romanian concordances

From: m_iacomi
Message: 25731
Date: 2003-09-10

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "altamix" wrote:

>> But, at least, how about stella
>> and steaua, sella - $(e)aua?
> [...]
> Because it has its own suffix "-ela" which is actually "-ealã".
[...]
> "OK, ok, the John , the ProtRomanian felt the need to make this
> difference. Agreed. But why exactly with /u/ between the boths /a/
> from final? Why not an another sound? Why exactly this /-u-/ ?"
> And this is in my opinion a very good question. Why /u/?
> I siply stil don't affirm I know why. It is not entirely clear. One
> can just speculate a bit on the basis of this.

Check the archive, you'll find all information needed:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/18799
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/18810
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/19300
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/19336
and, of course, rules posted by Miguel. There is no need of
any speculation.

Marius Iacomi