Re: Dolichophallic "Aryans"

aquila_grande wrote:

>There is a little misunderstanding here. I do not think
>Indoeuropeans had bigger dicks than any other people.

And what if they really had? :^)

>What I do think, however is this: In every population there is a
>tendency to think that members of ones own population is better
>equiped than other populations in every means: stronger, higher,
>more intelligent and - biger/stronger penises.
>
>Furthermore, i have the impression that in ancient idoeuropean
>cultures, the phallos was something important culturally.

You bet it was. :^)

>Therefore I think there is a great posibility that the indoeuropeans
>called themselves something like "giant-dicked" or some simular.

I must confess: it is amazing. :^)

But by the way: since our PIE-neighbuz, namely the
FinoUgrians were so generously endowed, then what's
the linguistic heritage? I'm asking as a more than
modest connoisseur of their remote kinship, namely
of the Ugrian Hungarians (Stichwort: "fasz" [fOs],
i.e. the Magyar phalic rendition in the lexic data
base).

George (a Latino-Slavic, with Germanic-Polish
werewolf shot, eager to learn ;^)