From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 25119
Date: 2003-08-16
>Miguel Carrasquer wrote:It ends in -at, doesn't it?
>
>>> It seems you forget what a role plays the suffix "-at" in DacoRom.
>>> This suffix makes:
>>> a) adjectives from substantives
>>> b) adjectives from adjectives
>>> c) name for animals; toponyms from adjectives
>>
>> And names of persons (bãiat, bãrbat, etc.)
>
>Wie bitte? Bãrbat (man) is considered to be direct Latin "barbatus" (
>ok, with semantical change) but there is a joke to see bãiat (boy) as
>any Latin derivatives from something like to bath.
>> Phantasy. What Lat. uxor (*(y)ug-sor) and soror (*swe-sor) have inA sister is a woman, no incest involved.
>> common
>> is the element *sor "woman".
>
>Was you the one who spoked about incest?:-)
>I guess I use the variant given by Dan Milton, this is why I gave thePokorny uses an i with a semicircle under it (non-syllabic i).
>entry number which is 1709. There is used the "y".