Re: [tied] egnis/ognis

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> So you invent a ridiculous pseudo-etymology, you see a ridiculous
> pseudo-problem with it, and you ask _other people_ for a solution? Oh,
> no... Use your brains and invent a ridiculous pseudo-solution on your
> own.
>

Easy, Sir. There is no invention or you are too tyred. I guess there is
just the exact etymology and not this arbitrary "manuale". And if you do
not agree with what I say, then show why. In fact there is nothing to
show. The changes are perfect regulary and the semantism is absolutely
OK.

And I do ask other people for how the compounds of words which end in
"s" and arre suffixed are looking like. This was a generaly question and
not a specialy one for the Rom. word. I meant the PIE morphologie here
and nothing more.

> OK, let somebody else explain things to Alex. I'll be away till
> Thursday. Have fun, everybody.
>
> Piotr

Have fun too.

Alex