Bulgarica (Was Re: [tied] Re: Yers)

> *****GK: Well, the Cybalist description reads:
> "Discussing matters of Indo-European history,
> linguistics and culture." Kindly explain to me how
> this thread "is becoming increasingly irrelevant to
> cybalist". Slavs are Indo-Europeans are they not? And
> we looked at this recent theory that the proto-Bulgars
> may also have been, did we not?*****

George, I agree, but the format of this list is such that it turns
dificult for me (and maybe for others) to follow so easily. It is
more effective to go on with the discussion somewhere else, where you
would not get a mailbox cluttered with messages on topics you cannot
devote to right now. I virually have to dig for the threads that
interest me. I suspect, other people have to dig for their threads as
well. So why not do each other a favor?


Eva